Tag Archives: BizTalk Server 2013

Azure, BizTalk, Blog , , , Leave a comment

BizTalk Integration Summit 2013 Recap

By Nick Hauenstein

The week before this last holiday week was quite a time to be in the BizTalk world. The BizTalk Integration Summit 2013 kicked off at the swanky Fairmont Olympic Hotel in Seattle, Washington bringing with it a defined release cadence and roadmap, new cloud-based product announcements, and even a peek into the plans for the upcoming on-premise version of BizTalk Server.

The First Peek

The first peek into what the Thursday-Friday event would hold is captured in this agenda from the first day. The first day contained a single track of content, where all attendees would be able to experience the same messaging and presentations. The second day provided two tracks for those who wanted to chose their own adventure.

agenda

Familiar Faces & New Faces

The man in the Red Polo himself – Scott Guthrie kicked off the event – and also took the opportunity to announce the general availability of Windows Azure BizTalk Services. To clarify, it’s real and released – no longer in preview – but also not a static unchanging thing (as we will see later).

scottgu

We also had a new face bringing the initial welcome – Mark Moritmore. He’s the man behind the event, having received the torch passed by Kent Brown (who is now working with NY-based integration powerhouse Nimbo). This guy is passionate about the product, and is a long-term thinker. He’s exactly what BizTalk needs as organizations continue to choose BizTalk Server and Windows Azure BizTalk Services for mission critical integration applications that are expected to have long lifespans.

mark

Updated WABS SDK

The announcement of the general availability of Windows Azure BizTalk Services left me itching to get the bits, and “play” with them for lack of a better term. However, all the turkey from Thanksgiving put me a week behind the times and I just had a chance to download/install the freshly released SDK last night. One of the changes I noticed right away (from the last time I had installed one of the preview SDKs), is that I wasn’t having to hunt for miscellaneous MSIs to install the pre-requisite components. The new streamlined setup just makes it happen (though you’d better have a SQL Server or SQL Server Express instance handy if you’re planning on using the BizTalk Adapter Service – it’s not going to do that for you).

auto_install_dependencies

One of the other things demoed at the summit was the BizTalk Service Explorer Visual Studio Extension. This is a nice little plug-in for the Server Explorer window that allows you to interact with BizTalk Services artifacts in really cool ways (e.g., submitting a test message without leaving Visual Studio). While the UI looks/feels clunky at times, it definitely gets the job done. After seeing it, this will be on my list of extensions to install by default.

biztalkservice_explorer

Misc Thoughts About WABS GA

Looking at WABS from the perspective of migrating existing on-premise solutions to the cloud, I’m not sure the story is really complete there (and that’s not some huge secret – WABS is still in active development, and upcoming changes will erase most of the concerns I’m about to mention).

First, as noted in an earlier post, I did have some expectations around the map upgrade tool that still weren’t really met with this release. I had at least hoped the limitations in the preview would not be seen in the final release, or that I would get happier results than I was seeing before out of the tool at the very least.

Another tool that ships with the SDK is a TPM migration tool (essentially to move parties/profiles/agreements to the cloud. While this is actually done pretty well, there is still some mismatch in capabilities (e.g., EDIFACT is available on-premise, but is still a future delivery for WABS) that will prevent moving all solutions.

I took a look at the X12 schemas while thinking through some integrations I’ve worked on in the past, and noticed an absence of the schemas used for HIPAA sub-document splitting. To be fair, I haven’t actually had an opportunity to test to see if that functionality is present (for the most part the schemas are 100% clones of the on-premise schemas, so maybe those extensions are implemented in the WABS version of the EDI Disassembler), but it’s not looking promising. So those integrations would potentially stay on-premise as well.

Another thing that makes me more than a little bit uncomfortable is the direct deployment from Visual Studio. I’m hoping we will see more solutions like Michael Stephenson’s AppFx.ServiceBus.Build that will make deployment a happier experience (and hopefully a fully automated one that doesn’t live in Visual Studio).

That’s not the end of the story though. I don’t intend to write this in such a way that it seems I’m saying that WABS is somehow unsuitable. Instead these are the places where there is still work to be done – and I’ll emphasize again – work is being done. EDIFACT support was confirmed as coming, along with a new rules engine (with new tooling), support for Windows Workflow Foundation workflows, AS2 support, and other fun extensibility points (e.g., BAM-like tracking, easy to build/lightweight adapters). So we’re getting a better B2B story, and also starting to see the seeds of a BPM story emerge within WABS.

Essentially WABS is doing great things already (for straight-forward X12 integrations built fresh for WABS), and will be doing even better things in the future.

BizTalk 2013 Updates Since Release

Another point of discussion was the present state of BizTalk Server 2013 on-premise, as well as a road map for the future. Since the release of BizTalk Server 2013, the BizTalk team has been hard at work, and shipping updates and new functionality (e.g., HIS 2013, which had been delayed due to close work between the product team and TAP customers to get everything happy and ready for release).

2013updates

BizTalk Futures (2013 R2 and Beyond)

Looking to the roadmap ahead, the team made a commitment to a release cadence (that in a way is a continuation of what we have already seen, but which hadn’t so much been publicly formalized). The release cadence going forward will see:

  • Major BizTalk Server release every other year
  • R2 BizTalk Server release every year there is no major release
  • Cumulative update package each quarter
  • WABS refresh each quarter

release_cadence

Looking at this slide, I feel like I’m looking at a description of the release cadence for Visual Studio. Which is nice, because in a way this provides some level of guarantee that I’m going to be able to develop BizTalk Server artifacts in vLatest of Visual Studio (give or take a few months in this case).

As part of the commitment to this release cadence, an announcement was made for BizTalk Server 2013 R2, which will bring:

  • Platform alignment
  • JSON Support (so much for all that work writing pipeline components!)
  • Proxy support for the SFTP adapter (as well as SSO support)
  • Authentication improvements for Service Bus
  • Healthcare Accelerator Improvements (slides to follow with specifics)

2013r2features2013r2features2

Exciting Road Ahead

When you get down to the bottom of it, it really is an exciting road ahead for BizTalk Server. I had a lot of fun this year at the BizTalk Integration Summit, and I’m hoping that this becomes an annual tradition and opportunity for the BizTalk community to come together in-person, and have a dialog with the team that’s building the product and service.

Before I close this post out, I want to give a shout out and thanks to everyone that stopped by our table and has found themselves sporting a new tablet cover with the QuickLearn Training logo (spread the love!), and a thanks to everyone who made it to our party at the Rock Bottom Brewery – lots of good times and good conversations were had there!

If you want to get some other perspectives on the summit, Saravana and Steef Jan (among others) beat me to the punch and have offered their thoughts here:

Well, it looks like I don’t have an excuse to sit in this restaurant any longer (one of the upper floors of a seemingly endless concourse at DEN). I’m going to go catch the rest of my flight out to Houston (completely different part of Houston than last time) to teach some TFS this week, and I’ll be back in short order. Until then, take care!

BizTalk, Blog, WCF , , , , , , 2 Comments

BizTalk Server 2013 Support for RESTful Services (Part 1/5)

By Nick Hauenstein

This post is the thirteenth in a weekly series intended to briefly spotlight those things that you need to know about new features in BizTalk Server 2013. It is also the first part of a five-part series on REST support in BizTalk Server 2013.

BizTalk Server 2013 is trying to make BizTalk Server not only the application/integration server for the enterprise, but also for the Cloud. Here we’re referring specifically to those Software-as-a-Service solutions provided by 3rd party organizations in an elastic fashion – usually exposing an API in the form of REST endpoints.

In this post, we will begin to explore the REST support in BizTalk Server 2013 in an overview fashion. We will then continue our exploration with a series of posts that cover common scenarios (Receiving data, POST-ing data, JSON en/decoding, and finally OAuth authentication).

How Do We Do REST in BizTalk Server 2013?

We do REST through BizTalk’s new WCF-WebHttp adapter. This adapter really is just another WCF adapter (like the SFTP adapter). It can be used on the Send or Receive side, in both one-way and two-way configurations.

image

In this case though, it is really clear that WCF is the underlying technology. Like all other service operations within BizTalk, we are exposed to operation mapping (the mapping of operations within orchestrations to actions in the service). However with the operation mappings in the WCF-WebHttp adapter, we don’t specify WCF actions so much as resources that we want to request (since it’s all just plain-old HTTP on the other end):

image

Do I Need a Dynamic Send Port To Do a GET?

The operation mapping shown above begs the question of how a GET request like this would work. Here we’re showing some sort of weather service that is providing temperature readings on a postal code basis. In order to make a request for the readings, one would have to access a URL that would change on a per postal code basis (i.e., the endpoint address changes).

Typically to accomplish something like sending to a dynamic address, one would use a dynamic send port. In the case of the WebHttp adapter, however, we get to specify variables within the path (which is shown in template form). In the screenshot above, we used the {postalCode} variable. Clicking the Edit button under Variable Mapping will lead us to the following screen:

image

Here we can see that in order to specify those variables, we simply pull from the context of the message traveling through the port. In this case we are grabbing the value for the {postalCode} part of the path from the Context Property named ZipCode.

Since most of the time that we are using the GET method, we don’t want to include a message (really it’s a request for a resource, and the dynamic part is the URL, not the body of the request), we can suppress the body using the Suppress Body for Verbs, and specifying the methods for which we want to not include a request body.

image

What Don’t I Get?

So far looking through the settings, it looks like we have a pretty good story around creating RESTful requests. However, we don’t have everything out of the box that we need to consume every single RESTful API out there.

You will still have to provide things like the following:

  • Encoding/decoding support (e.g., for JSON encoded messages)
  • WCF extensions for performing authentication (e.g., OAuth)
  • Schemas representing the requests/responses

These are some of the things that we will be covering within this series, so stay tuned over the next few weeks!

Do I Need BizTalk Server 2013 To Make this Happen?

While the adapter is new in BizTalk Server 2013, the underlying mechanism that makes it work is the WCF WebHttpBinding, which was around during the BizTalk Server 2010 timeframe. I’ve actually had people complain at me while explaining the WCF-WebHttp adapter as a new feature because of this.

Does that mean you can get it all up and running using something like the WCF-Custom adapter? Yes, and no. You can technically make it function with some additional legwork (e.g., as seen here), but you’re not going to get as smooth as an experience as you will see with BizTalk Server 2013 – it really feels cobbled together without having BizTalk Server 2013 at your disposal.

Coming Up Next

Next week I will be talking through the receive side of this story as we see how to host a RESTful endpoint in BizTalk Server 2013. Until then, take care (and take our classes)! Smile